From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

First Nat. Bank of Amityville v. Thomas Kells Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1913
154 App. Div. 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Opinion

January, 1913.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the assignee did not disclose the facts upon which rested the defense that plaintiff took the check with notice that it was issued without authority, but without prejudice to a new application to Special Term by the appellant, on papers which disclose facts which prima facie support his defense. Hirschberg, Burr, Thomas, Carr and Woodward, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

First Nat. Bank of Amityville v. Thomas Kells Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1913
154 App. Div. 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for

First Nat. Bank of Amityville v. Thomas Kells Sons

Case Details

Full title:First National Bank of Amityville, Respondent, v. Thomas Kells Sons…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1913

Citations

154 App. Div. 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Citing Cases

McMullen Machinery Co. v. Trust Co.

Applying the payments in this manner, none of the machines have been paid for in full, and petitioner…

Hoyt Bro. Co. v. Weiss Bros

Sayles' Ann. Stats., art. 3190b; Brothers v. Mundell, 60 Tex. 246; Keller v. Smalley Harris, 63 Tex. 519. It…