From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

First Equity Corporation v. Target Holding B.V

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 26, 2006
Case No. 05-70341 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 26, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 05-70341.

October 26, 2006


ORDER


On October 26, 2006, the Court held a hearing on the record on the following motions:

The motions of Moye White, LLP and Jaffe, Raitt, Heuer Weiss to withdraw as counsel for defendants Target Holding, B.V. and Senol Halfar;
Motion of defendants George Burmann and Gunnallen Financial, Inc. to stay proceedings against Target Holding, B.V. until a determination can be made as to who owns the controlling interest in Target Holding, B.V.

For the reasons stated on the record the motions to withdraw as counsel are GRANTED, and the motion to stay proceedings is DENIED.

The deadlines set in the amended scheduling order of September 15, 2006, stand. Should any party fail to meet these deadlines, the Court will entertain a motion to default that party. Should a default judgment be entered against a party it will be without prejudice as to the rights of the other parties in the premises.

Target and Halfar are urged to find substitute counsel as soon as possible to assure that their interests are adequately protected.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

First Equity Corporation v. Target Holding B.V

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 26, 2006
Case No. 05-70341 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 26, 2006)
Case details for

First Equity Corporation v. Target Holding B.V

Case Details

Full title:FIRST EQUITY CORPORATION and COMPUSONICS VIDEO CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 26, 2006

Citations

Case No. 05-70341 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 26, 2006)