From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Firkins v. Stromberg

United States District Court, D. Idaho
Apr 6, 2004
Case No. CV 04-110-E-LMB (D. Idaho Apr. 6, 2004)

Opinion

Case No. CV 04-110-E-LMB

April 6, 2004


ORDER


Pursuant to District of Idaho Local Civil Rule 16.1, a scheduling conference is to be conducted within ninety (90) days after a complaint has been filed. Prior to a scheduling conference being conducted, the parties must confer and discuss the items contained in the Scheduling Conference Form/Litigation Plan (see attached) and, after the parties have conferred regarding the Scheduling Conference Form/Litigation Plan, they must make their initial disclosures. See Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and D. Td. L. Civ. R. 16.1.

In addition, prior to a scheduling conference, the parties must advise the Court in writing if they wish to proceed before a Magistrate Judge by signing and returning the Notice of Availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction and Requirement for Consent (see attached). If a party does not wish to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, they must advise the Clerk of Court in writing and this matter will then be reassigned to a District Judge.

THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. All parties shall confer and discuss the items contained in the Scheduling Conference Form/Litigation Plan within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order. Thereafter, initial disclosures shall be made. The parties shall comply in all respects with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 and Local Rule 16.1.

2. The parties shall determine if this matter shall proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge or if they wish to request reassignment by either returning the Notice of Availability or requesting in writing that this matter be reassigned.

3. After the Scheduling Conference Form/Litigation Plan and consent decisions have been filed with the Clerk of Court, Plaintiff(s) shall be responsible for contacting Lynette Case, Judge Boyle's courtroorn deputy, at (208)334-9023, for the purpose of setting a scheduling conference. A scheduling conference will not be set until after the Litigation Plan and consent forms have been filed with the Clerk of Court. It shall be Plaintiff's responsibility to ensure that the Litigation Plan and consent forms have been filed with the Court prior to requesting a scheduling conference.

4. In the event the Litigation Plan and consent decisions have not been filed within ninety (90) days of the date of this Order , Plaintiff(s) shall submit a written report advising the Court of the status of this matter.

5. Plaintiff(s) shall be responsible for serving this Order on any party not represented on the attached Clerk's Certificate of Mailing,

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDRE TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION AND REQUIREMENT FOR CONSENT

In accordance with United Stales District Court for the District of Idaho General Order #159, and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, you are notified that a United States Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or nonjury trial, and to order the entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge is available only if all parries file a written consent, a coy of which is included in this notice.

You may without adverse substantive consequences withhold your consent. No judge shall be informed of a party's response to the clerk's notification, unless all parties have consented to the referral of the matter to a United States Magistrate Judge. The decision of the parties shall be communicated to the Clerk of Court.

An appeal from a judgment entered by a United States Magistrate Judge will be directly to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of this district. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); Fed.R.Civ.P. 73.

If you wish to consent to this matter being handled by a United States Magistrate Judge, please sign this form and return it to Ike address at the bottom of this form. If all parties do not consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge prior to the Rule 16.1 Scheduling Conference, this matter will not be reassigned.

NOTE: All consents and requests for reassignment should be sent to: Jeanie Loera, Deputy Clerk, U.S. District Court, 550 West Fort Street, Boise, ID 83724,

CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, the parties in this case consent lo have a United Stares Magistrate Judge conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including the trial, order the entry of a final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings.

party Represented Signature Date _________________ ____________ _______ _________________ ____________ _______

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FORM/LITIGATION PLAN

CASE #: ______________ NATURE OF SUIT: _______________

CASE NAME: _______________________

ASSIGNED JUDGE: United States Magistrate Judge Larry M. Boyle

PARTY BEING REPRESENTED:_____________________

plaintiff defendant parties have stipulated to the following dates

PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: ___________________________

ADDRESS:______

TELEPHONE: _____________

DEFENDANT'S ATTORNEY: _______

ADDRESS:______

TELEPHONE: ____________

PROPOSED DATES:

1. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS: _______________________

2. EXPERT TESTIMONY DISCLOSURES: (Local Rule 26.2(b))

Plaintiff identify and disclose expert reports by: _______

Defendant identify and disclose expert reports by: ____

All discovery relevant to experts shall be completed by: __________

3. FACTUAL DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE: (150 days prior to trial)___

4. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS FILING CUT-OFF DATE: (120 days prior to trial)_______________

5. ESTIMATED LENGTH OF TRIAL: _____________________________________

Jury Court

6. TRIAL DATE: __________________________________________________ (Enter proposed trial date(s) — actual trial date will be determined by the Court at the scheduling conference.)

ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION OPTIONS — (CHECK PREFERENCE)

[ ] MEDIATION (General Order No. 130) (Local Rule 16.5)

[ ] ARBITRATION (General Order No. 92) (Local Rule 16.5)

[ ] SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (Local Rule 16.4)

This Scheduling Conference/Litigation Form is to be filled out and filed with the Court prior to the scheduling conference.


Summaries of

Firkins v. Stromberg

United States District Court, D. Idaho
Apr 6, 2004
Case No. CV 04-110-E-LMB (D. Idaho Apr. 6, 2004)
Case details for

Firkins v. Stromberg

Case Details

Full title:RENA FIRKINS, Plaintiff(s), v. DONNA STROMBERG, Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, D. Idaho

Date published: Apr 6, 2004

Citations

Case No. CV 04-110-E-LMB (D. Idaho Apr. 6, 2004)