From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Firearm Owners against Crime v. Papenfuse

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 28, 2020
230 A.3d 1012 (Pa. 2020)

Opinion

No. 724 MAL 2019

04-28-2020

FIREARM OWNERS AGAINST CRIME; Kim Stolfer; Joshua First; and Howard Bullock, Respondents v. City of Harrisburg Mayor Eric PAPENFUSE; and Police Chief Thomas Carter, Petitioners


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court's decision to grant Plaintiffs, who have not been cited under the City of Harrisburg's gun control ordinances and for whom any harm is remote and hypothetical, individual and associational standing to challenge the City of Harrisburg's gun control ordinances, directly conflicts with this Court's jurisprudence.


Summaries of

Firearm Owners against Crime v. Papenfuse

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 28, 2020
230 A.3d 1012 (Pa. 2020)
Case details for

Firearm Owners against Crime v. Papenfuse

Case Details

Full title:FIREARM OWNERS AGAINST CRIME; KIM STOLFER; JOSHUA FIRST; AND HOWARD…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 28, 2020

Citations

230 A.3d 1012 (Pa. 2020)

Citing Cases

Firearm Owners Against Crime v. City of Harrisburg

Whether the Commonwealth Court's decision to grant Plaintiffs, who have not been cited under the City of…