From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fiorese v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1958
6 A.D.2d 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

June 23, 1958

Present — Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from a judgment entered on a jury verdict dismissing the complaint. Appellant was alleged to have been injured when he fell on a pathway on property owned by respondents as a result of respondents' negligence in having failed to secure a loose stone on the pathway. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No more than a question of fact was presented. It was proper to tax appellant with his inconsistent statements contained in his claim for workmen's compensation ( Nappi v. Falcon Truck Renting Corp., 286 App. Div. 123, affd. 1 N.Y.2d 750).


Summaries of

Fiorese v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1958
6 A.D.2d 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Fiorese v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL L. FIORESE, Appellant, v. SAMUEL ROSE et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1958

Citations

6 A.D.2d 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)