From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fiore v. Walden

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Apr 18, 2014
748 F.3d 1304 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 08–17558.

2014-04-18

Gina FIORE; Keith Gipson, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Anthony WALDEN; Unknown Agents of the Federal Government, Defendants–Appellees.

Robert A. Nersesian, Esquire, Nersesian & Sankiewicz, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Esquire, King & Spalding, Barbara L. Herwig, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant–Appellee.


Robert A. Nersesian, Esquire, Nersesian & Sankiewicz, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Esquire, King & Spalding, Barbara L. Herwig, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant–Appellee.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. 2:07–cv–01674–ECR–LRL.
Before: ALFRED T. GOODWIN, MARSHA S. BERZON, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

On February 25, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion reversing this Court, and holding that the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendant Anthony Walden. See Walden v. Fiore, ––– U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 1115, 188 L.Ed.2d 12 (2014). We therefore remand this case to the district court with instructions to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Fiore v. Walden

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Apr 18, 2014
748 F.3d 1304 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Fiore v. Walden

Case Details

Full title:Gina FIORE; Keith Gipson, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Anthony WALDEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Apr 18, 2014

Citations

748 F.3d 1304 (9th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Perez v. FCA USA LLC

Dismissal of the entire case is appropriate despite Plaintiffs' having named 100 "Doe" defendants. See Fiore…