From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fiore v. Dunne

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 5, 2020
180 A.D.3d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2019–10030

02-05-2020

In the Matter of Richard W. HOLMES, et al., Petitioners, v. Richard T. DUNNE, etc., et al., Respondents.

Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Leo Cuomo of counsel), for Petitioners. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Michael A. Berg of counsel), for Respondent Richard T. Dunne. Dennis M. Brown, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Drew W. Schirmer of counsel), for Respondent Suffolk County Department of Probation.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Leo Cuomo of counsel), for Petitioners.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Michael A. Berg of counsel), for Respondent Richard T. Dunne.

Dennis M. Brown, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Drew W. Schirmer of counsel), for Respondent Suffolk County Department of Probation.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondents, Richard T. Dunne, a Judge of the District Court and an Acting Justice of the County Court, Suffolk County, and the Suffolk County Department of Probation, from depriving the petitioners of certain time they had served on probation prior to being declared delinquent, after reinstating the petitioners' probationary status after violations of probation, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief. Motion by the respondent Suffolk County Department of Probation to dismiss the proceeding, inter alia, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding (see CPLR 7804[b] ; 506[b]; Matter of Tonawanda Seneca Nation v. Noonan, 27 N.Y.3d 713, 37 N.Y.S.3d 36, 57 N.E.3d 1073 ; Matter of Nolan v. Lungen, 61 N.Y.2d 788, 789–790, 473 N.Y.S.2d 388, 461 N.E.2d 874 ).

MASTRO, J.P., CONNOLLY, BRATHWAITE NELSON and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fiore v. Dunne

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 5, 2020
180 A.D.3d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Fiore v. Dunne

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Richard W. Holmes, et al., petitioners, v. Richard T…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Feb 5, 2020

Citations

180 A.D.3d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 861
115 N.Y.S.3d 722