From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finney v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Nov 10, 2011
No. 03:10-CV-06030-HU (D. Or. Nov. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. 03:10-CV-06030-HU

11-10-2011

ESTELLE L. FINNEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Kathryn Tassinari Brent Wells Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Dwight C. Holton United States Attorney Adrian L. Brown Assistant United States Attorney L. Jamala Edwards Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration Attorneys for Defendant


ORDER ON MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY FEES

Kathryn Tassinari

Brent Wells

Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dwight C. Holton

United States Attorney

Adrian L. Brown

Assistant United States Attorney

L. Jamala Edwards

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of General Counsel

Social Security Administration

Attorneys for Defendant HUBEL, Magistrate Judge:

The parties have filed a stipulation for an award of attorney's fees to the plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Under the statute:

A party seeking an award of fees and other expenses shall, within thirty days of final judgment in the action, submit to the court an application for fees and other expenses which shows that the party is a prevailing party and is eligible to receive an award under this subsection, and the amount sought, including an itemized statement from any attorney . . . representing or appearing in behalf of the party stating the actual time expended and the rate at which fees and other expenses were computed. The party shall also allege that the position of the United States was not substantially justified.
24 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(B).

The current motion is wholly unsupported. No itemized statement from the plaintiff's attorney is attached, and no allegation or supporting argument is made that the Commissioner's position was not substantially justified.

The motion is denied, without prejudice to refiling in proper form, no later than November 28, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis James Hubel

Unites States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Finney v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Nov 10, 2011
No. 03:10-CV-06030-HU (D. Or. Nov. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Finney v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ESTELLE L. FINNEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Nov 10, 2011

Citations

No. 03:10-CV-06030-HU (D. Or. Nov. 10, 2011)