From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finnegan v. Columbia Doctors

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 18, 2021
21-CV-6519 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-6519 (LTS)

08-18-2021

SEAN MATTHEW FINNEGAN, Plaintiff, v. COLUMBIA DOCTORS; ELIZABETH LEE, MD, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:

Plaintiff, who is appearing pro se, brings this action alleging that Defendants neglected him. The Court dismisses the complaint for the following reasons.

Plaintiff has previously submitted to this Court an identical complaint raising the same claim against these Defendants. That case is presently pending before this Court under docket number ECF 1:21-CV-6515, 2. As this complaint raises the same claims, no useful purpose would be served by litigating this duplicate lawsuit. Therefore, this complaint is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff's pending case under docket number ECF 1:21-CV-6515, 2.

Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as duplicative.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Finnegan v. Columbia Doctors

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 18, 2021
21-CV-6519 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Finnegan v. Columbia Doctors

Case Details

Full title:SEAN MATTHEW FINNEGAN, Plaintiff, v. COLUMBIA DOCTORS; ELIZABETH LEE, MD…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 18, 2021

Citations

21-CV-6519 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2021)