Opinion
2003-1410 RIC.
Decided June 22, 2004.
Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the Civil Court, Richmond County (B. Panepinto, J.), entered March 11, 2003, in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $2,054.38.
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
PRESENT: ARONIN, J.P., GOLIA and RIOS, JJ.
Plaintiff commenced this action for the return of his security deposit and for wrongful eviction. Plaintiff testified that he was never notified by defendants of their intent to terminate his tenancy and, on December 1, 2002, he was physically removed from his apartment by defendants and was told that if he returned to the apartment he would be harmed. Defendant Teddy Schwartz testified that in late November 2002, he informed plaintiff of his intention to terminate his tenancy and on December 9, 2002, plaintiff terminated the tenancy by voluntarily moving out of the subject apartment. Thus, an issue of credibility was presented and said issue was properly decided by the lower court in favor of plaintiff and should not be disturbed on appeal since said determination was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence ( see Jones v. Hart, 233 AD2d 297; DiSalvo v. Ordway, 208 AD2d 298).
Furthermore, while defendants argue that they are entitled to retain plaintiff's security deposit due to the fact that plaintiff damaged the subject apartment, defendants failed to establish the cost to repair the damages which did not result from ordinary wear and tear. Accordingly, we find no basis upon which to disturb the judgment in favor of plaintiff.