From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finley v. Walls

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-01399-LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-01399-LKK-GGH

09-19-2011

GAYLEN FINLEY, Plaintiffs, v. DAVID W. WALLS, D.O., and Does 1-20, inclusive, Defendants.

WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP MATTHEW W. POWELL Attorneys for Defendant DAVID W. WALLS, D.O. LAW OFFICES OF DAVID W. HOLOCHUCK DAVID W. HOLOCHUCK Attorneys for Plaintiff GAYLEN FINLEY


WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP

MATTHEW W. POWELL (SBN 114563)

SARAH L. SCOTT (SBN 272670)

Attorneys for Defendant

DAVID W. WALLS, D.O.

APPLICATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT AND ORDER

Judge: Judge Karlton

Dept.: Courtroom No. 4

Pursuant to Local Rule 144, Defendant David W. Walls, D.O. and Plaintiff Gaylen Finley, by and through their counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that Defendant shall have a second extension of time in which to respond to the complaint. This Court has previously granted Defendant an extension of time to respond to the complaint through and including September 16, 2011.

The Parties now request a further extension through and including October 7, 2011 for Defendant to file and serve his response to the complaint. The parties request this further extension because they are in the process of negotiating a resolution of this litigation. The Parties anticipate that they will be able to settle this action prior to the time any additional pleadings need to be filed, if a further extension is granted.

SO STIPULATED.

WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT,

GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP

MATTHEW W. POWELL

Attorneys for Defendant

DAVID W. WALLS, D.O.

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID W.

HOLOCHUCK

By: David W. Holochuck (authorized 9/7/2011)

DAVID W. HOLOCHUCK

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GAYLEN FINLEY

ORDER

Having reviewed the Parties application and considered the reasons for the requested extension, the Court hereby grants the Defendant a second extension of time to respond to the complaint. Defendant shall file and serve his response to the complaint on or before October 7, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Finley v. Walls

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-01399-LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Finley v. Walls

Case Details

Full title:GAYLEN FINLEY, Plaintiffs, v. DAVID W. WALLS, D.O., and Does 1-20…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-01399-LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)