From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finley v. Griggs

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 10, 2010
No. CIV S-07-2344 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2344 FCD EFB P.

November 10, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's October 27, 2010 motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: November 10, 2010.


Summaries of

Finley v. Griggs

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 10, 2010
No. CIV S-07-2344 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Finley v. Griggs

Case Details

Full title:JOWELL FINLEY, Plaintiff, v. R.L. GRIGGS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 10, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2344 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2010)