From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finkenkeller v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
No. CIV S-11-1261 GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1261 GGH

01-19-2012

JESSE WADE FINKENKELLER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff filed his complaint on May 11, 2011; service was executed upon defendant on June 27, 2011. On September 21, 2011, defendant filed with this court, and served upon plaintiff by mail, his answer and the administrative transcript.

Pursuant to this court's Scheduling Order (and allowing three days for service by mail, Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(e)), plaintiff was required to file a motion for summary judgment and/or remand within 45 days after service of the answer and administrative transcript. Plaintiff did receive one extension of time, but did not file his summary judgment motion by January 10, 2012, as ordered by the court.

ACCORDINGLY, within fourteen days of the filed date of this order, plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution, and shall file his summary judgment motion. Failure to timely file the required writings will result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Finkenkeller v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
No. CIV S-11-1261 GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Finkenkeller v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JESSE WADE FINKENKELLER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1261 GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)