From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finkelstein v. East 65th Street Laundromat

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 9, 1995
215 A.D.2d 178 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 9, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.).


The settlement negotiations between plaintiff and defendant landowner's insurer constitutes a reasonable excuse for defendant's delay in answering, and defendant's alleged lack of notice of any defect on the exterior stairway and assertion that it was the tenant's responsibility to repair the stairway constitute a meritorious defense.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Ross, Asch and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Finkelstein v. East 65th Street Laundromat

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 9, 1995
215 A.D.2d 178 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Finkelstein v. East 65th Street Laundromat

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN FINKELSTEIN, Appellant, v. EAST 65TH STREET LAUNDROMAT, Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 9, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 178 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 148

Citing Cases

Wachsman v. Catcendix Corp.

Even if the stipulation is construed to permit only opposition and not a cross-motion to plaintiffs' motion,…

Verizon New York v. Case Construction

Before: Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and Richter, JJ. Defendant demonstrated a reasonable excuse…