From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finkelstein v. Claudio

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 16, 2021
18-CV-2570 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 16, 2021)

Opinion

18-CV-2570 (VSB)

07-16-2021

STEVEN FINKELSTEIN, Petitioner, v. STEPHEN CLAUDIO, Respondent.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On June 16, 2021, Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Petitioner Finkelstein's petition for habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. 11.) The Report and Recommendation stated that Petitioner's objections to it must be served within fourteen days, i.e. by June 30, 2021. (See Id. at 21.) Although a copy of the Report and Recommendation were mailed to Petitioner, that mailing was returned as undeliverable. And after a diligent search, I have been unable to locate Petitioner, who did not update the Court with a current address as is required of him.

ORDERED that I will consider the Report and Recommendation as not objected to unless, on or before August 16, 2021, Petitioner (1) provides to the Court his current address; (2) files his objections to the Report and Recommendation; and (3) files a letter with the Court explaining why he failed to update his address sooner. Upon receipt of these materials I will decide whether or not it is appropriate to consider Petitioner's objections.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Finkelstein v. Claudio

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 16, 2021
18-CV-2570 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Finkelstein v. Claudio

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN FINKELSTEIN, Petitioner, v. STEPHEN CLAUDIO, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 16, 2021

Citations

18-CV-2570 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 16, 2021)

Citing Cases

Carey v. Passage

Accordingly, the Court considers the Report and Recommendation to be without objection. See Finkelstein v.…

Carey v. Passage

In the alternative, the Court may consider the Report and Recommendation to be unobjected to. See Finkelstein…