From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finkel v. Tech Man, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Feb 6, 2007
06-CV-2264 (CPS) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 2007)

Summary

finding rate of $200 per hour for a lawyer with eight years of experience reasonable, and citing cases finding up to $250 to be reasonable

Summary of this case from Jacobson v. Peterbilt Elec. Contracting, Inc.

Opinion

06-CV-2264 (CPS).

February 6, 2007


ORDER


No objections to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Matsumoto dated November 27, 2006, having been filed by the parties, the Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted. The plaintiff is directed to submit to the court by February 22, 2007, a revised proposed judgment consistent with Magistrate Judge Matsumoto's Report and Recommendation.

The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of the within to all parties and to the magistrate judge.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Finkel v. Tech Man, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Feb 6, 2007
06-CV-2264 (CPS) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 2007)

finding rate of $200 per hour for a lawyer with eight years of experience reasonable, and citing cases finding up to $250 to be reasonable

Summary of this case from Jacobson v. Peterbilt Elec. Contracting, Inc.

finding a rate of $200.00 per hour reasonable in an ERISA default matter for an attorney with approximately six years' experience

Summary of this case from LA BARBERA v. CYN-KEN DRIVER SERVICE CO., INC.

awarding $75 per hour for paralegal

Summary of this case from Finkel v. Ins Electrical Services Inc.
Case details for

Finkel v. Tech Man, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Dr. Gerald Finkel, as Chairman of the Joint Industry Board of the…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Feb 6, 2007

Citations

06-CV-2264 (CPS) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 2007)

Citing Cases

Finkel v. Amtex Electrical Corp.

Nonetheless, the Joint Board may use other relevant payroll reports to estimate the amount of contributions…

Trustees of I.B.T. Ins. Tr. Fund v. Amanda Carting

In cases where 26 U.S.C. § 6621 is used to calculate interest, courts have some judicial discretion in…