Opinion
Case No. 5:10-cv-05617-RS
10-25-2011
FINISAR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, OPTICAL COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants.
COOLEY LLP Sarah J. Guske (232467) Attorneys for Defendants OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., AND OPTICAL COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS, INC. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Dion Bregman Attorneys for Plaintiff FINISAR CORPORATION
COOLEY LLP
THOMAS J. FRIEL, JR.
(State Bar No. 80065)
MARK T. SMITH (State Bar No. 260845)
Five Palo Alto Square
SARAH J. GUSKE (State Bar No. 232467)
WAYNE O. STACY (pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Defendants
OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., and
OPTICAL COMMUNICATION
PRODUCTS, INC.
Daniel Johnson, Jr. (State Bar No. 57409)
Michael J. Lyons (State Bar No. 202284)
Harry F. Doscher (State Bar No. 245969)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FINISAR CORPORATION
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINE
Whereas, the parties seek the Court's clarification of certain deadlines and requirements relating to issues of validity under 35 U.S.C. § 112;
It is hereby Stipulated and Ordered that: :
1. Other than for terms for which a party otherwise seeks a construction from the Court or for 35 U.S.C. § 112(6) terms, it is not necessary for the parties to address 35 U.S.C. § 112 invalidity issues in Patent Local Rule 4 disclosures and not addressing such issues in the Patent Local Rule 4 disclosures will not be deemed a waiver of any of parties' rights, defenses, or claims.
2. The deadline for filing any opening motions for summary judgment relating to alleged invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 112 will be the same as the deadline for filing opening summary judgment briefs on other issues—a deadline which has yet to be ordered by the Court,
So Stipulated:
COOLEY LLP
Sarah J. Guske (232467)
Attorneys for Defendants
OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., AND
OPTICAL COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS,
INC.
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Dion Bregman
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FINISAR CORPORATION
Filer's Attestation re signatures: Sarah J. Guske hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
United States District Court Judge ____