From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fine v. Commissioner of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 2, 2016
133 A.3d 879 (Conn. 2016)

Opinion

03-02-2016

Paul FINE v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

Robert T. Rimmer, assigned counsel, Old Saybrook, in support of the petition. Lawrence J. Tytla, supervisory assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Robert T. Rimmer, assigned counsel, Old Saybrook, in support of the petition.

Lawrence J. Tytla, supervisory assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Opinion

The petitioner Paul Fine's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 163 Conn.App. 77, ––– A.3d –––– (2016), is denied.


Summaries of

Fine v. Commissioner of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 2, 2016
133 A.3d 879 (Conn. 2016)
Case details for

Fine v. Commissioner of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Paul FINE v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Mar 2, 2016

Citations

133 A.3d 879 (Conn. 2016)
320 Conn. 925