From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Findlay v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 24, 2022
No. 1D22-0998 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 24, 2022)

Opinion

1D22-0998

08-24-2022

Nashan Findlay, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Nashan Findlay, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus-Original Jurisdiction.

Nashan Findlay, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Because the trial court has ruled on the filing pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State, 770 So.2d 206, 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the motion pending below).

MAKAR, JAY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Findlay v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 24, 2022
No. 1D22-0998 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Findlay v. State

Case Details

Full title:Nashan Findlay, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Aug 24, 2022

Citations

No. 1D22-0998 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 24, 2022)