From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Findlay v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 24, 2022
346 So. 3d 208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D22-0998

08-24-2022

Nashan FINDLAY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Nashan Findlay, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Nashan Findlay, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because the trial court has ruled on the filing pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State , 770 So. 2d 206, 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the motion pending below).

Makar, Jay, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Findlay v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 24, 2022
346 So. 3d 208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Findlay v. State

Case Details

Full title:Nashan FINDLAY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Aug 24, 2022

Citations

346 So. 3d 208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)