From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finch v. Apple

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division
Sep 1, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV611-041 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV611-041.

September 1, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner has filed a Motion for Default Judgment in which he states that he is entitled to a default judgment because Respondent did not adequately respond to his petition for habeas relief. Therefore, he asserts, he should be released. Contrary to Petitioner's assertions, he is not entitled to an entry of default, as "default judgment is not contemplated in habeas corpus cases[.]" Aziz v. Leferve, 830 F.2d 184, 187 (11th Cir. 1987). Petitioner's Motion for Default and request for immediate release is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Finch v. Apple

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division
Sep 1, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV611-041 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Finch v. Apple

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CURTIS FINCH, Petitioner, v. BRIAN APPLE, Warden, and ATTORNEY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV611-041 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 1, 2011)