From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finch v. Andrews

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 6, 1994
881 P.2d 139 (Or. 1994)

Opinion

CC 91-2042-L-1; CA A78081; SC S40910

Argued and submitted September 1, 1994

October 6, 1994

In Banc

Larry B. Workman, of Frohnmayer, Deatherage, Pratt, Jamieson Clarke, P.C., Medford, argued the cause for petitioner on review. Robert S. Hamilton filed the petition.

Hugh B. Collins, Medford, argued the cause for respondents on review.

Charles F. Adams, of Stoel Rives Boley Jones Grey, Portland, filed a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Oregon Streetrod Association.

Phil Goldsmith, Portland, filed a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Review dismissed as improvidently allowed.


Summaries of

Finch v. Andrews

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 6, 1994
881 P.2d 139 (Or. 1994)
Case details for

Finch v. Andrews

Case Details

Full title:Hubert B. FINCH, Petitioner on Review, v. Ray ANDREWS, The National Hot…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Oct 6, 1994

Citations

881 P.2d 139 (Or. 1994)
881 P.2d 139

Citing Cases

Estey v. MacKenzie Engineering Inc.

A public policy must be "overpowering" before a court will interfere with the parties' freedom to contract on…