From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Financial v. Haynes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 25, 2008
56 A.D.3d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4658.

November 25, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered September 6, 2007, which, in an action on a "conditional sale contract note," denied plaintiffs unopposed motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for a default judgment and sua sponte dismissed the complaint as barred by the statute of limitations, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the matter remanded for further proceedings including entry of judgment.

Davidoff Malito Hutcher LLP, New York (Lewis M. Smoley of counsel), for appellant.

Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Moskowitz, Acosta, Renwick, JJ.

Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Moskowitz, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.


The statute of limitations must be pleaded as an affirmative defense and cannot be asserted sua sponte by the court as a basis for denying an unopposed motion for a default judgment ( see Buckeye Retirement Co., L.L.C., Ltd. v Lee, 41 AD3d 183, 184). We have reviewed plaintiffs submissions on the motion and find them sufficient for purposes of CPLR 3215.


Summaries of

Financial v. Haynes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 25, 2008
56 A.D.3d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Financial v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:ORIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Formerly Known as ORIX CREDIT ALLIANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 25, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9270
867 N.Y.S.2d 332

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank, NA v. Reed

Rather, a lack of standing on the part of a plaintiff is merely an affirmative defense which must be timely…

JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Katsabanis

A plaintiff without standing, like a plaintiff whose claim is stale under an applicable statute of…