From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Filsoof v. Cole

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2021
21 Civ. 1791 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 1791 (NRB)

12-01-2021

RACHEL CAROL FILSOOF, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW J. COLE, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is plaintiff's motion to compel defendant to produce certain discovery materials and to appear for a continued deposition at defendant's expense. This motion was unnecessary and unfounded, and thus is denied. Early on in this case, the Court cautioned the parties against adopting a needlessly contentious adversary style. Unfortunately, it appears that this admonition was not absorbed, as the parties' limited effort to comply with the meet and confer requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and our Local Rules attests. The Court trusts that this will be the last time that such a reminder is necessary.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at ECF Nos. 85 and 129.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Filsoof v. Cole

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2021
21 Civ. 1791 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Filsoof v. Cole

Case Details

Full title:RACHEL CAROL FILSOOF, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW J. COLE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 1, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 1791 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)