From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Filmat Realty Corp. v. Carleo

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Apr 18, 1946
186 Misc. 717 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)

Opinion

April 18, 1946.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, CARIELLO, J.

Nathan A. Goldenthal for appellant.

Joseph J. Crisa for respondent.
John B. O'Brien and Harold F. Garrahan for Paul Porter, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, amicus curiae.


MEMORANDUM


The relationship here was that of landlord and tenant with an allowance for services. There was no employment for wages. There was no denial of the appellant's testimony that he entered the premises as a tenant and many years subsequently was allowed a deduction from his rent for services. No termination of the original tenancy was established. Rent, as such, continued to be paid. Services were valued in terms of rent.

The final order should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $30 costs to appellant, and petition dismissed.

MacCRATE, McCOOEY and STEINBRINK, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Filmat Realty Corp. v. Carleo

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Apr 18, 1946
186 Misc. 717 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
Case details for

Filmat Realty Corp. v. Carleo

Case Details

Full title:FILMAT REALTY CORPORATION, Landlord, Respondent, v. NICK CARLEO, Tenant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Apr 18, 1946

Citations

186 Misc. 717 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
65 N.Y.S.2d 805

Citing Cases

Yui Woon Kwong v. Guido

If the occupancy of an apartment is incidental to the superintendent's service or is required expressly or…

York Sham Wong Yee v. Indelicato

There is nothing to show that the removal from 113 to 115 was required "by the employer for the necessary or…