From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Filler v. United Parcel Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION
Mar 2, 2020
CV 19-61-BMM-JTJ (D. Mont. Mar. 2, 2020)

Opinion

CV 19-61-BMM-JTJ

03-02-2020

ANTHONY FILLER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered his Findings and Recommendations in this case on November 19, 2019 (Doc. 22.) Judge Johnston recommended that Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6) be denied as moot.

Neither party filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. The parties have waived the right to de novo review thereof. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Absent objection, this Court reviews findings and recommendations for clear error. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). Reviewing for clear error and finding none,

IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 22) are ADOPTED IN FULL. Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6) is DENIED AS MOOT.

DATED this 2nd day of March, 2020.

/s/_________

Brian Morris

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Filler v. United Parcel Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION
Mar 2, 2020
CV 19-61-BMM-JTJ (D. Mont. Mar. 2, 2020)
Case details for

Filler v. United Parcel Serv.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY FILLER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 2, 2020

Citations

CV 19-61-BMM-JTJ (D. Mont. Mar. 2, 2020)