From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Filla v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE .
Apr 12, 2016
485 S.W.3d 827 (E.D. Mo. 2016)

Opinion

No. ED 102981

04-12-2016

Stephen M. Filla, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Matthew W. Huckeby, Office of Missouri Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.


Matthew W. Huckeby, Office of Missouri Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stephen M. Filla appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Filla v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE .
Apr 12, 2016
485 S.W.3d 827 (E.D. Mo. 2016)
Case details for

Filla v. State

Case Details

Full title:Stephen M. Filla, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE .

Date published: Apr 12, 2016

Citations

485 S.W.3d 827 (E.D. Mo. 2016)