From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Filiotis v. Noonan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 1989
150 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

May 8, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The contract of sale entered into by the parties provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: It is agreed between the Buyer and the Seller that in the event of any default by the Seller or Buyer for any reason whatsoever, liquidated damages shall be $1,000". While there is no explicit language in this provision or any other clause of the contract that the liquidated damages was to be the sole remedy, the circumstances surrounding the contract's execution, as elicited at the hearing, disclose that the parties intended that the liquidated damages clause would preclude specific performance (see, Rubinstein v Rubinstein, 23 N.Y.2d 293; Karpinski v Ingrasci, 28 N.Y.2d 45).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiff's complaint. Mollen, P.J., Kunzeman, Spatt and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Filiotis v. Noonan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 1989
150 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Filiotis v. Noonan

Case Details

Full title:ANN FILIOTIS, Appellant, v. JOSEPH NOONAN, as Executor of EMIL VANDEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 8, 1989

Citations

150 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Coizza v. 164-50 Crossbay Realty Corp.

The clear, unambiguous terms set forth above establish that the purchasers' sole remedy in the event title…

Coizza v. 164-50 Crossbay

Paragraph 21 (b), however, provided that the plaintiffs' remedy for the seller's failure to close was…