From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Filas v. Salisbury

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jul 12, 2017
SC: 156055 (Mich. Jul. 12, 2017)

Opinion

SC: 156055

07-12-2017

TAMARA FILAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DARYLE SALISBURY, Defendant-Appellee.


Order

156055 & (68)(69)(75)(76) Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices COA: 331458
Wayne CC: 15-002158-NM

On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for stay and for peremptory reversal are DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 12, 2017

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Filas v. Salisbury

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jul 12, 2017
SC: 156055 (Mich. Jul. 12, 2017)
Case details for

Filas v. Salisbury

Case Details

Full title:TAMARA FILAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DARYLE SALISBURY, Defendant-Appellee.

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Jul 12, 2017

Citations

SC: 156055 (Mich. Jul. 12, 2017)