From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Figueroa v. Wenerowicz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 30, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-1292 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-1292

01-30-2013

JOSUE FIGUEROA, Petitioner, v. MIKE WENEROWICZ et al, Respondents.


ORDER

AND NOW, this _ day of January, 2013, upon independent consideration of the pleadings and record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED;
2. Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED;
3. Petitioner's Petition for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 20) is DENIED;
4. Petitioner's Motion to Expand the Record with Transcripts of Jury Selection (Doc. 17) is DENIED; and
5. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark the above-captioned matter as CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

Hon. Petrese B. Tucker , U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Figueroa v. Wenerowicz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 30, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-1292 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2013)
Case details for

Figueroa v. Wenerowicz

Case Details

Full title:JOSUE FIGUEROA, Petitioner, v. MIKE WENEROWICZ et al, Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-1292 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2013)