From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Figueroa v. WellPath, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 20, 2023
21-cv-09766-CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2023)

Opinion

21-cv-09766-CRB

01-20-2023

ROSA FIGUEROA, Plaintiff, v. WELLPATH, INC., et al., Defendants


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

CHARLES R. BREYER, DISTRICT JUDGE

On October 21, 2022, Defendants Wellpath, Inc. and Paula McKinsey filed a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See dkt. 30. On January 3, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff Rosa Figueroa to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See dkt. 38. On January 19, 2023, the Court received a letter from Figueroa, asking that her case not be dismissed because she has “received permanent injury” and would like her case to “continue forward.” See dkt. 40.

Given Figueroa's stated intent to participate in the case going forward, Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED, without prejudice to a further motion if Figueroa fails to participate. Figueroa is ordered to cooperate with defense counsel to comply with all court deadlines and meet her discovery and disclosure obligations. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Figueroa v. WellPath, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 20, 2023
21-cv-09766-CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Figueroa v. WellPath, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROSA FIGUEROA, Plaintiff, v. WELLPATH, INC., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 20, 2023

Citations

21-cv-09766-CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2023)