From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Figueroa v. Cadbury Utility Const. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 1997
239 A.D.2d 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 27, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.),


Defendant's affidavit, asserting that he was cut off by plaintiff's automobile, raises issues sufficient to defeat summary judgment ( cf., Lenahan v. Goucher, 65 N.Y.2d 1034, revg on dissenting mem 111 A.D.2d 546, 548; Borgesano v. Hertz Corp., 69 A.D.2d 894).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Tom and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Figueroa v. Cadbury Utility Const. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 1997
239 A.D.2d 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Figueroa v. Cadbury Utility Const. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MARIA FIGUEROA, Respondent, v. CADBURY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 27, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 422

Citing Cases

Yoo Ja Oh v. Hazel

Charlton's testimony also indicates that Plaintiff s sudden lane change occurred "immediately prior" to the…

Dominguez v. Fontanella

Only evidence that the front vehicle veered in front of the rear vehicle (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1128 [a];…