From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Figueroa v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 13, 2006
1:05-CV-01049-REC-WMW-HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2006)

Opinion

1:05-CV-01049-REC-WMW-HC.

February 13, 2006


Order Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Document #9).


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See e.g., Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 889 (1958);Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 (1984). However, Title 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's request for appointment of counsel is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Figueroa v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 13, 2006
1:05-CV-01049-REC-WMW-HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Figueroa v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:LUIS FIGUEROA, Petitioner, v. DARREL G. ADAMS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 13, 2006

Citations

1:05-CV-01049-REC-WMW-HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2006)