Opinion
Case No. 8:10-CV-2722-T-30TGW.
June 20, 2011
ORDER
Before the Court is Petitioner's "Motion of Appeal" (Dkt. 27). The motion is largely nonsensical. Moreover, the motion is more in the nature of argument in support of Ground One of Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus, which alleges perjury by a state witness (see Dkt. 1 at p. 4). Further, the Court notes that the motion is nearly identical to Petitioner's reply (see Dkt. 30).
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Petitioner's "Motion of Appeal" (Dkt. 27) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida.