From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fields v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 7, 1996
666 So. 2d 554 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-485.

November 15, 1995. Rehearing Denied February 7, 1996.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court of Dade County; Frederick N. Barad, Judge.

De la O, Marko Wang and Miguel M. de la O, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Wanda Raiford, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.


After a careful review of the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion regarding the admissibility of evidence. Jent v. State, 408 So.2d 1024, 1029 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1111, 102 S.Ct. 2916, 73 L.Ed.2d 1322 (1982). Additionally, if there was any error in the admission of this evidence, that error was harmless in light of the solid eyewitness identification of the defendant. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Fields v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 7, 1996
666 So. 2d 554 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Fields v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROD FIELDS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 7, 1996

Citations

666 So. 2d 554 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)