Opinion
2:21-cv-02102-CDS-EJY
12-16-2022
MIKE FIELDS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MARLYN RAMIREZ, an individual, Defendant.
Joanna M. Myers, Esq. Jonathan W. Fountain, Esq. HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC Attorneys for Defendant Marlyn Ramirez Robert J. Carlson, Esq. Caleb A. Hatch, Esq. LEE & HAYES, P.C. BARRON & PRUITT, LLP Joseph R. Meservy, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Mike Fields
Joanna M. Myers, Esq. Jonathan W. Fountain, Esq. HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC Attorneys for Defendant Marlyn Ramirez
Robert J. Carlson, Esq. Caleb A. Hatch, Esq. LEE & HAYES, P.C. BARRON & PRUITT, LLP Joseph R. Meservy, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Mike Fields
ORDER
Plaintiff Mike Fields (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Fields”) and Defendant Marlyn Ramirez (“Defendant” or “Ms. Ramirez”) hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. On December 2, 2022, Plaintiff filed Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 42) (the “Motion”).
2. Pursuant to LR 7-2(b), Defendant's opposition to the Motion is due in 14 days, i.e., on December 16, 2022.
3. Defendant's counsel has requested, and Plaintiff's counsel has agreed, to grant Defendant a 1-week extension of time, until December 23, 2022, to file and serve Defendant's opposition to the Motion.
4. Good cause exists for the requested extension because: (a) Defendant's principal counsel, Ms. Myers, is presently occupied with obligations in other matters; (b) Defendant's cocounsel, Mr. Fountain, has only very recently been introduced to this matter; and (c) Ms. Ramirez, is presently out of the country which, due to the time difference, has made communicating with her counsel more difficult.
5. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to file and serve her opposition to the Motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED: