From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fields v. Cannady

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 11, 1984
456 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 84-765.

September 6, 1984. Rehearing Denied October 11, 1984.

Delia Doyle Rose of Haas, Boehm, Brown, Ridgon and Seacrest, P.A., Daytona Beach, for petitioners.

L. Edward McClellan, Jr., of McClellan Vostrejs, P.A., Ocala, for respondent.


Petitioners seek review by certiorari of an interlocutory order compelling production of seven exhibits claimed by the petitioners to be privileged. The exhibits, as described, appear to be materials privileged under the work product doctrine or at least prepared by or for petitioners or their representatives in anticipation of litigation or for trial. The seven exhibits were examined by Clayton Morrison, an expert witness employed by the petitioners. However, it does not affirmatively appear from a reading of Morrison's deposition that he used information from any of these exhibits to form his opinion testimony. Therefore, the writ is granted and the order compelling production is quashed.

Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(2)(A). See also Haddad, Certiorari in Florida, 29 U.Fla.L.Rev. 207, 224 n. 133, et seq. (1977).

SHARP, J., concurs.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., J., dissents without opinion.


Summaries of

Fields v. Cannady

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 11, 1984
456 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Fields v. Cannady

Case Details

Full title:DAVID R. FIELDS, ET AL, PETITIONERS, v. ALVA L. CANNADY, ETC., RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 11, 1984

Citations

456 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Reynolds

ANSTEAD, Judge, dissenting. I would grant the petition and quash the order of the trial court on the…