From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Field v. McMaster

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 20, 2010
398 F. App'x 894 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-1957.

Submitted: October 14, 2010.

Decided: October 20, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:09-cv-01949-HMH).

Arthur M. Field, Kathryn Taillon, T. Bart Kelley, Appellants Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Kenneth Paul Woodington, Davidson, Morrison Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Evan Markus Gessner, Michael Stephen Pauley, Lide Pauley, LLC, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Arthur M. Field, Kathryn Taillon, and T. Bart Kelley appeal the district court's order adopting in part the magistrate judge's recommendation and granting summary judgment in favor of several state employees in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the Appellants' motion to file a state transcript as an attachment to their informal brief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Field v. McMaster, No. 6:09-cv-01949-HMH, 2010 WL 3257888 (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Field v. McMaster

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 20, 2010
398 F. App'x 894 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Field v. McMaster

Case Details

Full title:Arthur M. FIELD, PhD.; Kathryn Taillon; T. Bart Kelley…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 20, 2010

Citations

398 F. App'x 894 (4th Cir. 2010)