From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fiedor v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 18, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02805-AP (D. Colo. Jan. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02805-AP

01-18-2013

Aleksandra Fiedor, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.

John F. Walsh United States Attorney J.B. Garcia Assistant United States Attorney District of Colorado For Plaintiff: Kenneth J. Shakeshaft For Defendant : Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J.B. Garcia
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado

For Plaintiff:

Kenneth J. Shakeshaft
For Defendant: Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: October 23, 2012

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: November 2, 2012

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: December 31, 2012

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the cases raises unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

The parties request the following briefing schedule within the standard time frame:

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: March 4, 2013

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: April 3, 2013

C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: April 18, 2013

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Indicate below the parties' consent choice.


A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: _________________
By: Kenneth J. Shakeshaft
1935 Jamboree Drive, Suite 202
Colorado Springs, CO 80920
719-635-5886
office@shakeshaftlawfirm.com
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY _________________
By: Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1001 17th Street, 6th Floor
Denver, CO 80202
303-844-0815
stephanie.kiley@ssa.gov


Summaries of

Fiedor v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 18, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02805-AP (D. Colo. Jan. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Fiedor v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Aleksandra Fiedor, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 18, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02805-AP (D. Colo. Jan. 18, 2013)