From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FIECHTNER v. BIO LIFE PLASMA

United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division
Apr 1, 2011
CV 11-13-M-DWM-JCL (D. Mont. Apr. 1, 2011)

Opinion

CV 11-13-M-DWM-JCL.

April 1, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr. filed an Amended Complaint in this action as required by Order dated January 31, 2011. United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch entered Findings and Recommendation on February 28, 2011 and recommended dismissing Fiechtner's Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, and for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff did not timely object to the Findings and Recommendation, and so has waived the right to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This Court will review the Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed."United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000).

After a review of Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendation, I find no clear error. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendation (dkt #9) are adopted in full. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, and for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

FIECHTNER v. BIO LIFE PLASMA

United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division
Apr 1, 2011
CV 11-13-M-DWM-JCL (D. Mont. Apr. 1, 2011)
Case details for

FIECHTNER v. BIO LIFE PLASMA

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES ADAM FIECHTNER, SR., Plaintiff, v. BIO LIFE PLASMA, JULIE BECK…

Court:United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division

Date published: Apr 1, 2011

Citations

CV 11-13-M-DWM-JCL (D. Mont. Apr. 1, 2011)