From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FIDELITY DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND v. F.J. MUMM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

January, 1934.

Present — Sears, P.J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.


Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum. Even if it be assumed that in the action entitled Vorce v. Town of Tonawanda, this defendant F.J. Mumm Contracting Company was sufficiently vouched into the action so as to be bound by the judgment — neither in the judgment roll in that action nor in the testimony presented upon the instant trial does it sufficiently appear that negligence of the Mumm Company was a contributing cause of the death of Kenneth Vorce. The burden of proof as to this was upon plaintiff. ( Parisi v. Hubbard, 226 App. Div. 280, 282.) All concur.


Summaries of

FIDELITY DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND v. F.J. MUMM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

FIDELITY DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND v. F.J. MUMM

Case Details

Full title:FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Respondent, v. F.J. MUMM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)