Opinion
No. 165.
Argued April 20, 1909. Decided April 26, 1909.
Writ of error to review judgment of the Court of Appeals of Kentucky dismissed without opinion, for want of jurisdiction, notwithstanding the contention of plaintiff in error that where a state court in construing a contract departs from its established and applicable mode of procedure theretofore applied under similar circumstances due process and equal protection of the law are denied.
Mr. William H. Field for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Charles F. Taylor for defendant in error.
Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Central Land Company v. Laidley, 159 U.S. 103; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U.S. 180; Bacon v. Texas, 163 U.S. 207; Burt v. Smith, 203 U.S. 135; Barrington v. Missouri, 205 U.S. 485; Tracy v. Ginzberg, 205 U.S. 170; Thompson v. Kentucky, 209 U.S. 430.