From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fhisihazion v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Feb 21, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-4785 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-4785

02-21-2020

YEMANE FHISIHAZION, A-215945211, Petitioner, v. JOE M. SMITH, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Petitioner Yemane Fhishazion (A-215945211) filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging the duration of his confinement by Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") officials with the United States Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"). The respondents have filed a motion to dismiss the petition as moot, advising the Court that Fhishazion has been removed from the United States to Eritrea on December 11, 2019, and is no longer in DHS custody. (Doc. No. 9). Fhishazion has not responded to the motion and his time to do so has expired. After considering all of the pleadings and the applicable law, the Court will grant the respondents' motion and dismiss this case as moot.

I. DISCUSSION

Fhishazion, a native of Ethiopia and citizen of Eritrea, filed this petition to challenge his ongoing custody without a foreseeable removal date under Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), alleging that he has been held for more than six months after the expiration of the removal period. Id. at 701. Respondent has advised the Court that Fhishazion was removed to Eritrea on December 11, 2019. See Doc. No. 9 at 1. Fhishazion's removal from the United States and release from custody renders his habeas corpus petition moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998) (holding that a case becomes moot if it "no longer present[s] a case or controversy under Article III, § 2 of the Constitution" because "[t]he parties must continue to have a 'personal stake in the outcome' of the lawsuit'") (quoting Lewis v. Cont'l Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 477-78 (1990)). Because Fhishazion challenged only his continued detention, his release from custody leaves nothing for this Court to remedy. See id. at 18. The Court concludes, therefore, that Fhishazion's petition must be dismissed as moot.

II. ORDER

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 9) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice as MOOT.

2. All other motions, if any, are DENIED as MOOT.

The Clerk will provide a copy of this order to the parties.

SIGNED at Houston, Texas, this 21st day of February 2020.

/s/_________

ANDREW S. HANEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Fhisihazion v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Feb 21, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-4785 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Fhisihazion v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:YEMANE FHISIHAZION, A-215945211, Petitioner, v. JOE M. SMITH, WARDEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Feb 21, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-4785 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2020)

Citing Cases

Maci v. Hable

Because Maci "challenged only his continued detention, his release from custody leaves nothing for this Court…