From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feske v. MHC Thousand Trails Ltd. P'ship

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE DIVISION)
Oct 13, 2011
CASE NO. 11-04124 (PSG) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 11-04124 (PSG)

10-13-2011

DAVID FESKE and TERI FESKE, individually and on behalf of Class Members, Plaintiffs, v. MHC THOUSAND TRAILS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; MHC OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES, INC., a Maryland corporation; THOUSAND TRAILS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.; a Nevada corporation; and Does 1-100, inclusive, Defendants.

SHENKMAN & HUGHES KEVIN I. SHENK MAN MARY R. HUGHES R. REX PARRIS LAW FIRM R. REX PARRIS ALEXANDER R. WHEELER KITTY K. SZETO Alexander R. Wheeler Attorneys for Plaintiffs David and Teri Feske, individually and on behalf of Class Members JENNER & BLOCK LLP DAVID J. BRADFORD MICHAEL T. BRODY JEAN M. DOHERTY David J. Bradford Attorneys for Defendants MHC Thousand Trails Limited Partnership; MHC Operating Limited Partnership; Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.; and Thousand Trails Management Services, Inc.


JENNER & BLOCK LLP

David J. Bradford (Pro Hac Vice)

Michael T. Brody (Pro Hac Vice)

Jean M. Doherty (Cal. Bar No. 264308)

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS

SHENKMAN & HUGHES

Kevin I. Shenkman (Cal. Bar No. 223315)

R. REX PARRIS LAW FIRM

R. Rex Parris (Cal. Bar No. 965567)

Alexander R. Wheeler (Cal. Bar No 239541)

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR l.R.3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

[] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

[×] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) the parties have agreed to pursue private mediation and are currently identifying an appropriate mediator.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

[] The presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[×] Other requested deadline: January 31, 2012

SHENKMAN & HUGHES

KEVIN I. SHENK

MAN MARY R. HUGHES

R. REX PARRIS LAW FIRM

R. REX PARRIS

ALEXANDER R. WHEELER

KITTY K. SZETO

Alexander R. Wheeler

Attorneys for Plaintiffs David and Teri Feske,

individually and on behalf of Class Members

JENNER & BLOCK LLP

DAVID J. BRADFORD

MICHAEL T. BRODY

JEAN M. DOHERTY

David J. Bradford

Attorneys for Defendants MHC Thousand Trails

Limited Partnership; MHC Operating Limited

Partnership; Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.; and

Thousand Trails Management Services, Inc.

DAVID FESKE and TERI FESKE, individually and on behalf of Class Members, Plaintiffs,

v.

MHC THOUSAND TRAILS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; MHC OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES, INC., a Maryland corporation; THOUSAND TRAILS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.; a Nevada corporation; and Does 1-100, inclusive, Defendants.

CASE NO. 11-04124 (PSG)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS


[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

[] Non-binding Arbitration
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
[] Mediation
[×] Private ADR

Deadline for ADR session

[] 90 days from the date of this order.
[×] Other: January 31, 2012

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Feske v. MHC Thousand Trails Ltd. P'ship

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE DIVISION)
Oct 13, 2011
CASE NO. 11-04124 (PSG) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Feske v. MHC Thousand Trails Ltd. P'ship

Case Details

Full title:DAVID FESKE and TERI FESKE, individually and on behalf of Class Members…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE DIVISION)

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 11-04124 (PSG) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)