Opinion
C.A. PB 07-1995
03-20-2013
For Plaintiff: Richard J. Welch, Esq., Michael T. Eskey, Esq. For Defendant: Stephen J. Darmody, Esq., Thomas W. Lyons, III, Esq.
For Plaintiff: Richard J. Welch, Esq., Michael T. Eskey, Esq.
For Defendant: Stephen J. Darmody, Esq., Thomas W. Lyons, III, Esq.
DECISION
SILVERSTEIN, J.
This Amended Decision is being filed to correct page 12, paragraph 2 of the above-captioned Decision originally filed on March 19, 2013.
Line 1 of this paragraph should read as follows:
Huhtamaki posits five reasons for its request for a new trial: (1) the improper admission of expert testimony; (2) the improper admission of certain documentary evidence and its associated testimony; (3) errors in the jury instructions; (4) the improper interruption and foreclosure of Huhtamaki's closing argument; and (5) the weight of the evidence not supporting the presence of contamination at the time of Closing or the reasonableness of damages awarded.
The remaining contents of the Decision remain the same.