From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferri v. Greater New York Brewery, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1943
266 App. Div. 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Opinion

November 1, 1943.


Defendant appeals from an order (1) granting plaintiff's motion to preclude defendant from offering any proof to sustain the allegations of its several separate defenses and counterclaims because of failure to serve a bill of particulars; and (2) denying defendant's cross motion to be relieved of its default and to vacate or modify plaintiff's demand for a bill of particulars. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and plaintiff's motion to preclude denied, without costs. Defendant's cross motion is granted, without costs, to the extent of relieving defendant of its default, and the matter is remitted to Special Term to pass upon the nature of the bill of particulars to be served. In the opinion of this court the order precluding defendant from offering any proof and refusing to vacate its default was an improvident exercise of discretion. Close, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ferri v. Greater New York Brewery, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1943
266 App. Div. 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Case details for

Ferri v. Greater New York Brewery, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PASQUALE FERRI, Respondent, v. GREATER NEW YORK BREWERY, INC., Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1943

Citations

266 App. Div. 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Citing Cases

Universal Metal Prod. v. De-Mornay Budd

A preclusion order is not mandatory under this rule merely because a party failed to furnish a bill of…

Jacobs v. Jacobs

Defendant served a demand for a bill of particulars consisting of 31 items. Plaintiff's motion to vacate the…