From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferrell v. Leonard

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 21, 1917
76 So. 51 (Ala. 1917)

Opinion

6 Div. 582.

May 17, 1917. Rehearing Denied June 21, 1917.

Appeal from City Court of Birmingham; C. W. Ferguson, Judge.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., L. E. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Cabaniss Bowie and Smith Wilkinson, all of Birmingham, for appellants. C.B. Powell, of Birmingham, for appellees.


The final decree in this cause must be reversed, as it was based upon decrees pro confesso taken without notice after the appellants had regularly entered an appearance, some by demurrer, and all by a plea. Chancery Rules 46, 48; Vary v. Thompson, 168 Ala. 371, 52 So. 951. It has been suggested that this is a moot case as to some of these appellants, in that some of them have turned over certain books, funds, etc., to the receiver. Whether this be the case or not, it would not exclude the consideration of the appeal as to the other respondents, there being a severance in the assignments of error, or prevent a reversal, and the respondents who are no longer necessary parties can be discharged by the trial court.

The decree of the chancery court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

McCLELLAN, SAYRE, and GARDNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ferrell v. Leonard

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 21, 1917
76 So. 51 (Ala. 1917)
Case details for

Ferrell v. Leonard

Case Details

Full title:FERRELL et al. v. LEONARD et al

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 21, 1917

Citations

76 So. 51 (Ala. 1917)
76 So. 51

Citing Cases

Capps v. Norden

The order appealed from is not a final decree and will not support an appeal. Wood v. Finney, 207 Ala. 160,…

Valenzuela v. Sellers

Bevis v. Wishart, 30 Ala. App. 568, 10 So.2d 47; Equity Rules, 39-45; Crimm v. Crimm, 211 Ala. 13, 99 So.…