From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferraro v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 6, 2022
No. 11232-20S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 6, 2022)

Opinion

11232-20S

01-06-2022

Michael Ferraro & Amanda Ferraro Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

On March 10, 2021, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction as to Taxable Year 2018. On April 22, 2021, respondent filed a supplement to his motion. In his motion, as supplemented, respondent seeks to have this case dismissed on the grounds that the petition was not timely filed with respect to the notice of deficiency issued to petitioners for tax year 2017 and no notice of deficiency was issued to petitioners for tax year 2018 that would confer jurisdiction on this Court. Although the Court directed petitioners to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss, as supplemented, petitioners failed to do so. The record shows that the petition was not timely filed with respect to the notice of deficiency issued to petitioners for tax year 2017 and there is no indication that respondent issued a notice of deficiency to petitioners for tax year 2018.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, as supplemented, is granted and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Ferraro v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 6, 2022
No. 11232-20S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Ferraro v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Michael Ferraro & Amanda Ferraro Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

No. 11232-20S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 6, 2022)