From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FERNON, INDORSEE OF LYNCH v. FARMER'S ADM'R

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1832
1 Del. 32 (Del. Super. Ct. 1832)

Opinion

Spring Sessions, 1832.

J. A. Bayard, for plff.

Hamilton and Wales, for deft.


Plff. proved the execution of the note and the indorsement to him, and a promise, by the deft's. intestate, after the indorsement, to pay the note to plff.

Hamilton, for deft. moved a nonsuit.

The note declared on is a note payable to Thomas Lynch, or order. The note proved, is payable to Thomas Lynch, but not to his order. This is a fatal variance.

Bayard suggested that the words "or order," might be stricken out without affecting the instrument; if so, it is mere surplusage.

Wales replied, that is was of substance and material. Chitty on Bills, 140.

The question was, whether the words "or order" were necessary to make the note negociable, and the court being of that opinion,

Nonsuited the plff.


Summaries of

FERNON, INDORSEE OF LYNCH v. FARMER'S ADM'R

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1832
1 Del. 32 (Del. Super. Ct. 1832)
Case details for

FERNON, INDORSEE OF LYNCH v. FARMER'S ADM'R

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS FERNON, Indorsee of JNO. LYNCH vs. THOMAS FARMER'S Administrator

Court:Superior Court of Delaware

Date published: Jan 1, 1832

Citations

1 Del. 32 (Del. Super. Ct. 1832)