From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fernie v. Wincrest Capital, Ltd.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 21, 2019
177 A.D.3d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

10401 10401A Index 653282/18

11-21-2019

Rebecca FERNIE, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. WINCREST CAPITAL, LTD., et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Mischon De Reya New York LLP, New York (Vincent Filardo, Jr. of counsel), for appellant. Sidley Austin LLP, New York (Christina Prusak Chianese of counsel), for Wincrest Capital Ltd., Barbara Ann Bernard, Joanne Marie Bernard, Francis Joseph Crothers and HedgePort Associates LLC, respondents. Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, New York (Hannah M. Thibideau of counsel), for Press Management, LLC, respondent.


Mischon De Reya New York LLP, New York (Vincent Filardo, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

Sidley Austin LLP, New York (Christina Prusak Chianese of counsel), for Wincrest Capital Ltd., Barbara Ann Bernard, Joanne Marie Bernard, Francis Joseph Crothers and HedgePort Associates LLC, respondents.

Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, New York (Hannah M. Thibideau of counsel), for Press Management, LLC, respondent.

Richter, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Gische, Webber, Kern, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry R. Ostrager, J.), entered April 15, 2019, dismissing the complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered February 28, 2019, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

This is a dispute among residents of the Bahamas, including plaintiff, in which plaintiff alleges fraud and improper ouster from her position in a Bahamian company. All the tortious acts alleged took place in the Bahamas, plaintiff's injury occurred in the Bahamas, and the company at issue has it principal office in the Bahamas. Bahamian law will govern at least some of the claims. Therefore, although there are some witnesses and evidence in New York, and one defendant is a New York resident, the court properly determined that New York is an inconvenient forum for this action ( CPLR 327[a] ; see Hanwha Life Ins. v. UBS AG , 127 A.D.3d 618, 8 N.Y.S.3d 180 [1st Dept. 2015], lv denied 26 N.Y.3d 912, 2015 WL 7376060 [2015] ).


Summaries of

Fernie v. Wincrest Capital, Ltd.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 21, 2019
177 A.D.3d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Fernie v. Wincrest Capital, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:Rebecca Fernie, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wincrest Capital, Ltd., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 21, 2019

Citations

177 A.D.3d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
110 N.Y.S.3d 853
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 8488

Citing Cases

Quinn v. The Hosp. for Special Surgery PHO

. And in Fernie v Wincrest Capital, Ltd. (177 A.D.3d 531, 531-532 [1st Dept 2019], Iv denied 35 N.Y.3d 907…

BSR Fund, S.A. v. Jagannath

The dispute is primarily among those defendants and plaintiffs who reside in Greece, the fraud originated in…